Making Remote Work Work for Everyone
One thing is for sure: It’s hard to underestimate the popularity of working from home. According to Statista, 91 percent of employees worldwide prefer full or almost-full remote work. It’s easy to see why, when Forbes reports that full-time office employees spend an average of $1,020 monthly on in-office and commuting expenses. Commuting also costs something even more valuable: time. With the average American commute taking 27.6 minutes, traffic-trapped employees bemoan the lost time that could have been spent sleeping, minding children, exercising — or, really, doing almost anything else.
A 2023 Pew Research study found that work from home enabled better work-life balance for 71 percent of respondents. That’s especially true for parents of children younger than 18, 76 percent of whom said remote work was very or somewhat helpful for work-life balance (compared to 69 percent of non-parents). Curiously, 12 percent of respondents felt remote work actually hurt their ability to strike the right work-life balance — a small percentage, but one perhaps indicative of varying abilities to adapt.
Work from home also offers the flexibility to work at more desirable times and use break times more effectively.
“As a night owl, traditional office hours always felt constraining,” Demartis said. “Working from home allows me to align my work with my natural productivity cycles. I can tackle complex tasks when I’m most alert and use breaks productively — whether it’s a mid-day gym session or grocery shopping during off-peak hours.”
But what about productivity? That’s a complicated question and one that’s still being studied closely. To a great extent, it depends on an individual’s work ethic and practices. And some are more disciplined than others. Demartis, for instance, reports an increase in productivity while working from home.
“During a critical translation project for an international client, I experienced the true power of remote work’s flexibility,” he said. “When a power outage hit my neighborhood, I seamlessly transitioned — first working from a local café with excellent WiFi, and then from a colleague’s home the next day. These experiences reinforced my appreciation for not being tethered to a single physical workspace, proving that professional commitment isn’t about location, but adaptability and connectivity.”
According to Work From Home and Productivity: Evidence From Personnel and Analytics Data on Information Technology Professionals, a study published in the University of Chicago’s Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, overall productivity remains nearly unchanged — but due to inefficiencies and communication difficulties introduced by remote work, workers may actually be working longer.
“In our sample, employees were able to maintain similar or just slightly lower levels of output during [work from home,]” the study concludes. “In order to do so, they worked longer hours. For this reason, productivity, measured by output per hour worked, fell by 8-19 percent.”
By contrast, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics found a positive relationship between remote work and productivity.
“Total factor productivity growth over the 2019–22 period is positively associated with the rise in the percentage of remote workers across 61 industries in the private business sector, even after accounting for pre-pandemic trends in productivity,” the study states. “This is because unit costs, especially unit non-labor costs, grew less in industries where more work was done from home.”
Researchers are still laboring to understand one possible downside of remote work: social isolation. With less time out of the house interacting with coworkers, some report a degradation in mental health.
“The primary downside is potential social isolation, which varies by location,” Demartis said. “I’ve noticed this more acutely in Canada compared to Spain, where community connections seem more naturally integrated into daily life.”
According to a Gallup study on the subject, 20 percent of workers report their mental health is either fair or poor, a health issue leading to nearly 12 days in unplanned absences on average. That adds up to USD $47.6 billion annually in lost productivity — to say nothing of the humanitarian concerns.
Pew Research backs social isolation as the chief remote work concern, with 53 percent of respondents reporting that working from home “hurts their ability to feel connected with co-workers.
“In spite of this, those who work from home all the time or occasionally are no less satisfied with their relationship with co-workers than those who never work from home.”
Studies show that female workers are most likely to be affected by the social isolation of remote work. Younger professionals, who face more challenges building lasting social relationships in a highly atomized and digitized world, are also more likely to face mental health impacts. The upshot: While the impact varies by individual, all remote workers should make a point to take special care of their mental well-being.
Regardless of the potential downsides, it’s clear the vast majority of workers consider remote work a major boost to their overall happiness and workplace satisfaction — one that makes a material difference in where they choose to work. Moving into 2025, the biggest outstanding question is whether employers will continue their quest to kill remote work in the cradle.
For many employees, a return to five days in the office is a regression to policies of centuries past — and they’re not interested in going back.
“We’re moving beyond outdated work models inherited from the industrial era, where physical presence was equated with productivity,” Demartis said. “Technology has now enabled a more flexible, results-oriented approach, and personal discipline remains the key to making this new work paradigm successful.”